The Clinton Couple and their entourage
of smarmy followers have busied themselves with smearing a greasy, rancid
hypocrisy all over the Nation. In their newly incarnated roles as pious
born again collectivists, they've found a new calling as pulpit preachers.
I'm sorry. I sinned. Sniffle, sniff, sniffle. But as paragons of situation
ethics and masters of deceit, they convenience themselves with only those
elements of Judeo-Christian culture that excuse their self serving behavior
and their cultural quagmire. And all the while, behind our backs, they
smugly give the American public the finger while mouthing the hollow words,
"trust me." And at long last this smelly spin and prevarication has landed
in the House of Representatives. So strap on your moral flack jackets,
because this descent into Hell has only just begun. It's going to be a
long ride down. By the way, thanks very much to all of William Jefferson
Clinton's followers for giving so much of themselves to push us over the
brink.
One of my dearest and most admirable
friends is a rancher by profession. His father was a rancher, as was his.
His hands are scarred and bent. His legs are as bowed as anyone I've ever
seen. At 70 he still hauls around his 24 foot stock trailer behind his
Ford pickup even to church, horses saddled, ready to push cattle up and
down some of the steepest slopes imaginable. He sometimes puts in 25 miles
or more in a day looking for a single stray calf. And he is a patriarch
in that large and beautiful church, as his grandfather helped found the
ministry back in 1876. After one of those grueling days on horseback, my
wife and I were visiting while he sprawled awkwardly on the living room
floor. His grandson rubbed his feet for him, while his daughter eased the
tension in his neck and stroked his hair. When the phone rang, his wonderful
wife left her efforts in the kitchen and brought him the phone. Judge Starr
had released his Whitewater report to Congress. And it was foul. Terribly
foul. My rancher friend hung his head and agreed with the caller. "Yeah.
I heard about it. It's awful sad. This president of ours is a true disgrace.
Yeah, he's done some terrible things. But not only that, he's surrounded
himself with a bunch of crooks." Surrounded himself with a bunch of crooks.
Well, it looks more and more if this could in fact be true.
We've all heard the stories about the
string of dead witnesses and friends. We know the jokes about the dangers
of being a FOB, or a "friend of Bill's." The term "Arkancide" will probably
end up as a standard American dictionary definition for children to wonder
over for centuries to come. And then there was the firing not only of the
White House Travel Office members, but most of the attorneys at the Justice
Department, to be replaced with "friends of Bill." Friends who, like the
lawyer Tom Cruise played in the film, "The Firm," find themselves in the
awkward position of being trapped where they sit once they've attached
themselves to the power from Arkansas.
But all this not withstanding, at the
very least, there's his phalanx of sleazy apologists. If these people aren't
crooks, then who are? These are people who for the sake of their jobs,
their political positions, or their spiteful ideologies, have sunken into
fault projection of the most unimaginable sort. And all but a handful have
any idea what they're really asking for when they justify not only the
behavior, but the mendacity behind it.
"In our country,
the lie has become not just a moral category but a pillar of the State.’’—Alexander
Solzhenitsyn
And that is in fact the entire matter in
a nutshell. Authoritarian collectivism has postulated its entire philosophy
on the lie. To lie for the sake of the "children" is not a lie, but a moral
relativism. And once in a position of power to benefit those "children,"
then lying to remain in power or even increase it is likewise justifiable.
And so on until, in spite of the hollow moralizing rhetoric, the children
are forgotten, just as they were during the Stalinist purges in the former
Soviet Union. And prevaricating to save the skins of those who've clawed
and killed their way to the privileged position of managing that authoritarian
collective, becomes the end in itself. And of course, you all know that
this condition unequivocally constitutes a state of tyranny. That's what
is really meant when they insist that the "ends justify the means." But
they lie about that too. So unless you really step back and objectively
evaluate this dogma, you really tend to believe that this is just about
delivering "free" medical care. The qualifying term is "free," of course.
For anyone over the age of ten knows there's no free lunch.
"The greater the
power the more dangerous the abuse." —Edmund Burke
And that is precisely why we've been screaming
at the Clinton/Gore tree huggers and warm fuzzy bear liberal foreign policy
makers, that character does matter! And we're not talking about the kind
of character that ends up whining and sniveling under pressure, or begging
off after abusing people in lesser positions of power. The Whitewater fiasco
is not and has never been just about sex. You know that, whether you're
ready to admit it or not. Now that it's probably too late, a few are waking
up from their intoxication with the Clinton charm and the absurd notion
that he could represent America with the 60's generation version of "free"
love. A "free" love that requires no commitment and no responsibilities
if we are caught.
And as it turns out, it wasn't love
after all, but the lowest form of lust, with almost no regard for the needs,
feelings, or political realities of others around. Everyone is an expendable
object. And if they object, they had sex with him, but he didn't have sex
with them. So much for the soccer mom mentality. At least a few less minions
are buying it now that the string of progressively insincere mea-culpas
has begun to gag even some of the unshockable members of the baby boomers.
But I promised that the decent into hell would incur the wretched in us.
And it will. If the can of worms behind the Clinton morality is not closed
post haste, it will be our very own Pandora's Box.
Do you remember that the Clinton appointee
to the U.S. Supreme court, Ruth Bader Ginsberg, sailed through confirmation
hearings, even though Neo-Conservatives testified on C-SPAN coverage that
she had written in favor of lowering the age of consent to twelve? And
not to be outdone, that ultra-liberal Dr. Mary Calderone, a founding member
of America's most influential sex education 'clearinghouse,' the Sex
Information and Education Council of the United States, or SIECUS,
had a word of her own to contribute? It seems that during a conference
of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sex, she condoned pedophilia
with the comment, "I have a question that is almost the reverse of what
we've been talking about [which was pedophilia, or child molestation].
What do we know about situations in which young children and older people
have had a sexual relationship of one kind or another that has been pleasant,
and the child feels good about it because it's warm and seductive and tender?
If the child really enjoys this, it may be the only time the child ever
gets a loving touch..." So there you are. Better a child be seduced by
a "warm caring adult" than be protected by law from molestation and never
know the "pleasant loving touch" of Dr. Calderone! So if the "New Age"
Clinton moralists have their way, we might be apologizing for the next
president's peccadilloes with a teen-ager, or even a child.
Do you recall that even the incest taboo
has finally been overturned by the liberal social engineers, and we are
now urged to revise our attitudes toward the same. SIECUS has launched
a pro-incest campaign, and their 1992 publications catalog listed pro-incest
studies. Author Claire Chambers wrote in her book, The SIECUS Circle, "…the
SIECUS program of sex education [was] a carbon copy of the Swedish program,
as adopted by UNESCO." Heralded as an icon of social and sexual tolerance,
the ultra-liberal Swedish government was reported by one source to have
legalized father-daughter incest as a means of 'democratizing' the
family. Liberals will now have us believe that incest democratizes the
family! If this report is true, it would seem the cutting edge of Liberal
Democracy and Gramscian moral relativism in action. Would we now rationalize
Clinton's behavior if Chelsea were his Oval Office playmate? What if he
said he was sorry, that he sinned? Would we all shuffle away and refuse
to throw the first stone? That's where we're heading, folks.
Remember NAMBLA, or the North American
Man/Boy Love Association, a national organization of those openly calling
for legalizing sex between adult men and boys? They marched in the streets
of the Nation's Capital publicly advocating their position during the Clinton
inauguration in 1992 because they felt he represented a liberalization
of sexual mores. Incredibly, according to Human Events' Capital Briefs,
September 29, 1995, the New York Department of State approved NAMBLA as
a legitimate, tax-exempt, non-profit organization. This technically qualifies
them for tax-payer funded grants to further their cause. So whether effected
tax payers agree with men having sex with young boys or not, they are now
required by law to participate in supporting a group whose publicly stated
primary goal is to legalize such activities. Incredibly, under the modern
American system of silent collectivism, we are now forced to pay to make
it possible for child molesters to seduce our own children!
Meanwhile, anyone objecting to such
radical cultural changes in our society is quickly labeled 'repressive'
and intolerant by those who desperately seek to justify their own sheer
brand of extreme carnal addiction. The president of NAMBLA, Peter Melzer,
just happened to be a Bronx High School physics teacher. Concerned parents
pressured the New York Board of Education, which concluded that it was
undesirable for Melzer to teach children because of his pedophilic activism.
Yet the ACLU and the New York Times promptly came to Melzer's defense!
In perfect Gramscian knee jerk response, and behind quaint rose-colored
glasses, pop-culture always immediately falls in behind each new wave of
'liberation,' even if it includes incest or pedophilia. If you think that
this means little to you, think again. Historically, from the practices
described above, it is only one short step further for a culture to condone
selective genocide, politicide, or infanticide. Of course, it will not
be described as such, but rather veiled behind some Politically Correct
curtain of 'compassion,' enforced by the state, and all the while silently
orchestrated by an autocratic ruling elite disposing of enemies and unwanted
classes of people.
So will we now be bowing under the strain
of accepting a presidential love affair with a child of the same sex, simply
because he's "done such a good job of being president?" What if he say's
he's sorry? What if he totes his bible around and conveniently gets himself
born again? Do you want to put your son up as an intern to find out? Do
you know that when Classical Rome fell from the Republican model to become
a Imperial Dictatorship, that emperors sunk so low as to pay the mothers
of innocent, toothless, suckling infants to perform fellatio on them?
What's the matter? You mean you're still
not shocked yet? Well try this on for size.
No longer satisfied with natural sex,
or even kinky heterosexual episodes, or even homosexual trysts, the radicals
of Generation-X set the stage for our own colorful future. Forget obscene
tattoos, or mere multiple body piercings. The young radicals of Generation-X
are now into slashing and gashing themselves, and drinking each other's
BLOOD. It's a fact, Jack. They are living out their own rendition of Hollywood's
teen-age culture television event, "Buffy The Vampire." Now from vampirism,
it's only one more step to cannibalism, and then.... Well, what makes us
think we'll even get that far? Really?
For one thing, Bill Clinton has finally
been caught red handed. Not only seduced a twenty-one year old intern in
the highest public office of the land, but contemptibly trying to sell
it as his private life. He lied about it under oath, a felony, and risked
the fate of the entire nation while attempting to cover the damn thing
up using everyone and everything at his disposal. So we have a brief, momentary
opportunity to hold him and his henchmen accountable. It may not be an
exposure of all he's done, but it's a start.
You mean there's more? Looks like it.
Consider the so-called "Filegate" affair.
This involved an illegal request by the White House for at least 900 confidential
FBI files concerning Republicans and opponents of the President. During
Watergate, one member of Nixon's staff, Charles Colson, went to prison
for three years for misusing a single FBI file. But now Bill Clinton and
his followers want us to turn our heads away from his indiscretions and
let him walk away.
"A man’s character
is his fate." —Heraclitus
On the July 8th broadcast of Quinn in the
Morning, Larry Klayman of Judicial Watch was talking about the Clinton
Administration. He said,
"...at [this] point we're in
a communist/socialist state...what we're talking here is 1984. Bill Clinton...is
the most corrupt president in the history of this country...And his people
knew exactly what they were gonna face, before they took power...they knew
that people were gonna resist them strenuously...would be fought every
step of the way...So they prepared for this eventuality, and they got control
of the entire federal government, its apparatus, and they in fact created
what is a criminal enterprise. I mean, it has hit me, I think it's hit
everybody, that the greater interest here is the country. And unless you
put that first, and don't worry about yourself, that doesn't mean you expose
yourself, but don't worry about the consequences of doing something that's
right, then we're in a spiraling situation where this country will just
go downhill and crash and burn. And the next administration, God forbid,
if we get another administration like this, could do this country in. It
could finish us off."
Not everyone comprehends just what this
really means to America. It really ISN'T about sex at all. And it's not
just about obstruction of justice, either. It's about the total loss of
what's left of the Republic to the totalitarian socialist methodology,
which is a beast who's character represents criminal tyranny by it's very
nature. The leftist ideologues and the wealthy internationalists oligarchies
that hope to use this form of dictatorship to their ends bet their wad
on this administration, precisely as their predecessors did with various
degrees of success by supporting Lenin, Hitler, and Mao. If FDR introduced
us to Democratic Socialism, WJC and his Gramscian gang are introducing
us to some form of collectivist Totalitarian Stalinism.
So folks, it's all or nothing from this
point on. If Clinton, at least as the figurehead for this clique of global
collectivists, isn't exposed to justice, then the odds suggest it's over
for us as a Nation. The next step for us will be a transition, probably
a fairly rapid one, to some form of serious and massive repression, however
well disguised at the outset by the apologists and media propagandists
on the left. It's clearly understandable why those who understand this
are full of passionate exigency, and some are even beginning to despair
in earnest. They realize that the crew of private investigators will give
way to a form of Wafen SS. They know the abusive use of the IRS will expand
to include all forms of political dissention. They comprehend that next
time it won't be just 900 FBI files and control of the Justice Department,
but TOTAL control of those agencies through internal arrests, blackmail,
and assassination. They understand that in a generation, the body count
for the executive will not be 40 or 50, but hundreds of thousands. Trumped
up Incarceration as a political mechanism will become the norm."
Fascism: Any program
for setting up and centralizing an autocratic regime with severely authoritarian
politics exercising regulation of industry, commerce and finance, rigid
censorship, and forcible oppression of opposition. —Webster's
Unabridged Dictionary
In effect, Klayman justifiably diagnosed
America with a form of painful and highly fatal cancer. When we say the
hour is growing late, some of us believe it's a fact. If anyone thinks
that our relatively prosperous moment makes this untrue, go back and re-read
Solzhenitsyn's history of the subtle transition from Lenin to Stalin. While
not a precise analogy, it's close enough to remind us of the method. We're
only a dangerous step away from our own tragedy. What we're witnessing
is in fact a raging ideological civil war over the issue itself. Like it
or not, ready or not, the entire country is busy choosing up sides. Those
who favor Marxist statism, against those who would resist in the name of
liberty and human rights. If Clinton is ousted in disgrace, there will
be a moment of respite. If not, well the next move will be anyone's guess.
We can assume, though, that it will not be all that pretty. If anyone thinks
this has been ugly so far, it's likely to become an astoundingly repulsive
hydra within one or two more administrations following Clinton's methods.
"Truth never envelops
itself in mystery, and the mystery in which it is at any time enveloped
is the work of its antagonist, and never of itself." —Thomas Paine
The ends justify the means. What the followers
on the left adamantly refuse to acknowledge, is that the character of the
ends are a mirror product of the means.
They all stand around patting themselves
on the back for their ability to deceive as a method of spreading the collectivist
plague they've unleashed. A plague of an uncontrollably passionate lust
for power. But they fail to comprehend that each new lie weakens the very
foundation of the lofty positions to which they aspire, to which they seek
security from primordial power itself, like an obese person who finds security
in compulsive eating. They actually believe that with control of arms,
control of banking, control of the media, and an assorted phalanx of body
guards and taste testers, that they will successfully be immune to the
ravages of their very own weapon of disease. That no Brutus will ever quietly
step up behind them, from their own personally trusted ranks, and shove
a Roman short sword into their viscera. But that foolishness is precisely
why they will fail in the end.
As they systematically destroy trust
to achieve their ends, each one of them, even those at the pinnacle of
power itself, expose themselves to the bloody Luciferian source of that
very power they have worked so many centuries to bring into effect. It's
war alright. But not with or between physical entities, but between principalities,
wickedness in high places. Higher than pitiful mankind himself.
“There is no such
thing as truth either in the moral or in the scientific sense. The needs
of the State are the sole determining factor. What may be necessary today
need not be so tomorrow. This is not a question of theoretical suppositions,
but of practical decision dictated by existing circumstances. Therefore,
I may – nay – must – change or repudiate under changed conditions tomorrow
what I consider correct today" — Adolph Hitler – Rauschning,
The Voice of Destruction, pp. 223
Their own Tower of Babel will one day lay
in ruins, broken and tattered, just as the great cities of the past. Cities
built of hundred ton blocks of solid granite men dragged around by hand.
Cities sprawled in the dust like so many child's building blocks. Like
King David, the richest man on the planet, they condemn themselves to walk
the parapets of their own violent repression. With all the material things
a human could desire at their finger tips, their dissatisfaction, that
to which humans long for most will remain forever beyond their reach. They
compulsively worship a god who despises them, who's only goal is to entrap
them and make them suffer. And suffer they will, in loneliness and isolation,
without the warm approval of a trusted father that the little child in
each one of them yearns for. They will never forgive themselves for their
own cowardice, and in the final moment of life, will whimper for the love
they so scornfully squandered in their haste to cut that Faustian deal.
So who's your hero now, soccer moms?
"America is great
because America is good. When America ceases to be good, she will cease
to be great." —Alexis de Tocqueville
What really frightens me is not Bill Clinton,
for no matter how powerful, he's just one man. It's the interlaced ideological,
political, and financial thread behind him that are willing to risk anything
as it appears, to secure and consolidate their tenuous hold on power in
the name of collectivism. The group that lies to themselves so well they
either ignore or justify the socialist murder of as many as 100 million
or more people in this Century alone. And all in the name of the "children."
This group would stand behind a completely
untrustworthy giggle boy, figuring they can control him and the associated
risks, while they use both him and us to advance their openly proclaimed
dream of imposing themselves on the entire world through some desperate
form of neo-globalism.
I wonder if these "best and brightest"
are really as good at political chess as they claim?
And what if they're not? |